Throwing in the Towel on US Equities? UBS or Credit Suisse Could Be Next…

“Turning points in human consciousness occur when new energy regimes converge with new communications revolutions, creating new economic eras.” – Jeremy Rifkin

Like watching a movie in slow motion, this week Alphacution adds some incremental modeling on UBS and Credit Suisse to its recent analysis on bank-owned broker-dealers.  We start with this metaphor to emphasize the caveat that anything observed in slow motion may be prone to some illusion. So, this opening is simply fair warning – and a grain of salt.

Also, for those of you who are new to the thread and want to catch up, we started with “Remembering Deutsche Bank: A Market Macro-Structure Canary?” and then followed with “Goldman, Morgan and Deutsche: Comparing Bank-Owned Broker-Dealers in Equities.” Both are worth a read… (The rest of us will wait here while you do so.)

Anyway, if we were to take Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (DBSI) as a guide, wherein 18-year lows of measures like gross cash equities – which is the sum of equities owned and equities “sold but not yet purchased” – were used to represent relative strength or weakness of the underlying business, we would then need to put our friends at UBS and Credit Suisse in the same category. For each of DBSI, Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC (CSS) and UBS Securities, LLC (UBSS) – all three the US broker-dealer arm of a foreign bulge bracket bank – gross cash equities levels sit at 18-year lows as of December 31, 2018 (see below).

Though we will need to dig deeper to understand and then explain wtf is going on with CSS between about 2005 and 2013 (and therefore we will ignore it for now), a measure of net cash equities – which is the difference between equities owned and equities sold but not yet purchased – displays a similar trend: All three display among the tightest dollar-neutralities in equities for 2018 relative to the full 18-year period (see below).

However, it is based on the next measure – total broker-dealer assets over the 18-year period beginning 2001 and ending 2018 – that we may discover the greatest cause for concern here. If the longevity of Deutsche Banks equities business is now in existential jeopardy – particularly in contrast with their relatively strong FICC (fixed income, currency and commodity) business – then Credit Suisse and especially UBS (with roughly half the assets of DBSI and CSS and a weaker FICC business) may find themselves in a similar predicament (see below).

Now, in respect of the possible illusions of incrementalism, it’s premature to run this warning all the way up the tallest flagpole without performing similar modeling and analysis on the other bulge players, like Citigroup, Bank of America, JPMorgan, HSBC, Barclays, and SocGen (see quarterly market share chart below), as well as some 13F analysis to assess possible shifts in holdings and positioning. We will likely not be back on this topic until we can be a bit more comprehensive…

However, if these measures continue to deteriorate, expect the probability of retrenchment scenarios – like those of DB’s recent announcements – to increase. Periodic headlines illuminating layoffs, departures (including team liftouts) and/or restructurings should support persistence of this trend. Furthermore, we don’t see anything on the horizon to turn the macro-driver of disintermediation around – so, some of this is merely a matter of time.

Apologies for the partial buzzkill. It’s awfully tough to throw a towel being impersonated by a wet blanket…

Support the Feed!

Individual Subscription Options

Note: Business credit cards and bank accounts can be used via our PayPal payment portal.

Alphacution is in the intelligence business.

For those of you who are eager to derive greater value from this work and apply that intelligence to your own business interests, Alphacution is offering unaffiliated individual subscription options priced at $275 per year or $25 per month, cancellable at any time. Both of these options include a rebate on purchases of deeper, more substantive reports and case studies.

In other words, the entire value of an individual subscription paid up to the point of purchasing a single report will be deducted from the purchase of that report. (Rebates not to exceed the maximum value of an annual subscription.)

Enterprise subscription packages for individuals affiliated with trading firms and custom content/service engagement options are available upon request at

Now, for those of you who don’t expect to take advantage of the offers outlined above but want to continue to enjoy the insights, intelligence and occassional entertainment that remain openly available on the Feed, I want to make this specific plea:

Free doesn’t mean there are no costs. In fact, in this case, there have been extraordinary costs in the accumulation of experience and sight, meticulous curation and assembly of data, and creative visualization of and storytelling around our findings.

So, if you value quality content – here or anywhere else – then you need to find a way to support that content at some level simply because you want it to continue to exist. Our post, In Support of Digital Content – which was adapted from other notable digital era content developers – makes a more expansive case for this perspective.

Bottom line: Your efforts to support via one-time or recurring contributions will help guard against this content needing to move from the currently preferred audience-driven model (for its level of independence) to a sponsorship-driven model (which can be found on most other industry media outlets).

So, if none of the subscription options suit you, one-time and recurring support contributions can be made at any level here:

Of course, as always: If you value this work, please continue to “like it,” share it, comment on it – or discuss amongst your colleagues – and then send us

As our “feedback loop” becomes more vibrant – given input from clients and other members of our network, especially around new questions to be answered – the value of this work will accelerate.

Don’t be shy…

Unsubscribe from prior subscriptions without further obligation, at any time, here:

By | 2019-08-29T21:33:42-04:00 August 28th, 2019|Alphacution Feed|

About the Author:

Paul Rowady is the Director of Research for Alphacution Research Conservatory, a research and strategic advisory platform uniquely focused on modeling and benchmarking the impacts of technology on global financial markets and the businesses of trading, asset management and banking. He is a 30-year veteran of the proprietary, quantitative and derivatives trading arenas. Contact:; Follow: @alphacution.