“Creativity is just connecting things. When you ask creative people how they did something, they feel a little guilty because they didn’t really do it, the just saw something. It seemed obvious to them after a while” – Steve Jobs
For Mitch (1957 – 2018)
Let’s start this one close to where we left off in The Privatization of Alpha:
“He’s a dubious character – and, he maintains specific distinction as my all-time strangest interview; sitting there in his personal office’s gymnasium – like an antechamber – as I sat there at the leg press machine in my Armani suit and him, as Tom Wolfe wrote in A Man in Full, eventually breaking out in “saddlebags of sweat” on his spin bike as we chatted. That was 1994 – and I did not get the job.”
If it had not been for the perpetually warm and generous teddy bear known as Mitch Lester – who I met and quickly befriended to become “the Wadster” in 1990 while he and brother, Andy, were brokers for Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette – my 30-year highlight reel in some rare corners of the proprietary trading game would not have been nearly as colorful, nor as instructive. From Steve Cohen to Soros’ CIO and partner, Scott Bessent, and a cast of global trading royalty in between, Mitch eagerly and graciously made introductions on my behalf that few others could or ever would have been willing to make.
Mitch is survived by wife, kids and brother Andy – and I want to make sure that they know he will always be loved and never be forgotten in my house. He was like a brother…
Now, when it comes to Steven A. (“Stevie” to Mitch) Cohen – founder of legendary hedge fund SAC Capital Advisors, for those that are just joining the thread here – there are few on the face of the planet who have inspired more mythology and earned more notoriety in the annals of trading and hedge funds than this guy. Take a stroll through his Stamford, CT headquarters – at 72 Cummins Point Rd. (hence the new name “Point72”) – and it’s not long before you are hypnotized into the belief that this is more art gallery than legendary trading outfit; just a small sample of the toys and trinkets that have been assembled as dividend for Steve’s knack for engaging in financial markets…
As a result, the combined track record – and 13F filings data – for the lineage of SAC and Point72 is quite long, and therefore, representative of considerable fodder for the absolute and relative study of trading strategies. Given that, I want to keep this one tight, not bite off more than we need to chew in one sitting, and with the goal of showcasing two initial observations from the modeling so far:
- Are there any detectable changes in strategy during the transition from SAC to Point72? (If so, what are they?)
- Given what we observe among other managers, what is the apparent relationship between the SAC/Point72 lineage of core strategies and ETF exposures?
Here we go:
In the chart below, Alphacution presents the SAC/Point72 lineage of 13F gross notional long market value for a lengthy, yet disguised, period of time for the purpose of seeing if the transition from SAC to Point72 causes an easily detectable shift in strategy. Is there more than a name change in this transition that occurs in mid-2014?
Chances are that unless you know this particular view of the track record extremely well, there is no detectable shift in underlying strategy. So, to extend this exercise one step further, in the chart below Alphacution presents the SAC/Point72 lineage of 13F total positions for the same long, yet disguised, period above. Here, clues of some type of strategy shift exist…
Adding the axis labels back, the chart below presents the point at which the 13F gross notional long market value times series changes from SAC to Point72. Here, there is still no discernable shift in strategy, but one thing’s for sure: As of September 30, 2018, this piece of Stevie’s book – likely his biggest piece – is more valuable than it has ever been in his storied history…
However, when we take another look at total 13F positions, there is a dramatic consolidation in position count (from ~1,700 to ~700) during the transition to Point72, which submitted its first 13F filing for the quarter ending June 30, 2014:
Alphacution’s read of this one major shift in strategy is a consolidation, of sorts, to best ideas – which resulted in a near doubling of average position size (by value) from about $10 million each to about $20 million each, see below:
Sure, there could be other explanations for the halving of equity position count. And, we would need to look at the data for affiliated managers – Sigma Capital, CR Intrinsic Investors , SAC Global, and Parameter Capital – to dig a little deeper (which we will eventually do). However, for now, it looks like Mr. Cohen closed ranks on best ideas but boosted average position value to keep maximum capital at work during the transition to a totally proprietary trading operation…
As for point #2 above, the limited use of ETFs (less than 0.9% of long market value over 59 quarters modeled so far) is unique among strategies we have explored to date; making the information implied by the chart below extremely revealing – but, not all that surprising.
Bottom line: This is clearly a stock picker’s strategy focused on harvesting very specific information asymmetries…
It’s late. Probably best to leave it there for now. 😉
Note: Business credit cards and bank accounts can be used via our PayPal payment portal.
Alphacution is in the intelligence business.
We are uniquely focused on harvesting, packaging and distributing intelligence about the impacts of technology in financial markets and on the businesses of trading, asset management and banking. Our growing model library is our intelligence asset. Today, this intelligence asset primarily supports written research content, which can be accessed via standardized subscriptions and customized engagements. Occasionally, this core asset also supports video, audio and live presentation content. In time, Alphacution’s intelligence asset will support a broader platform of products and services, like data feeds and software.
For the past year or so, Alphacution has been publishing most of its research content on its Feed for free, and promoting that content via periodic newsletter. The purpose of this strategy has been to assess the interest in and demand for a unique perspective and a new level of intelligence on the financial markets ecosystem.
And, based on the growth in network and activity around that research, it seems that we have struck a cord with many of you – a network of senior executives representing some of the most advanced players in the global financial markets arena and their stakeholders.
The recent trajectory of pageview metrics on our site is symbolic of this claim, as shown below:
Now it’s time to take that level of engagement and direct it towards a more viable long term economic support model that ultimately allows us to scale our team and enhance the quantity and quality of our intelligence.
So, here’s what we are going to do about that:
For those of you who are eager to derive greater value from this work and apply that intelligence to your own business interests, Alphacution is offering individual introductory subscription options priced at $275 per year or $25 per month, cancellable at any time. Both of these options include a rebate on purchases of deeper, more substantive reports and case studies.
In other words, the entire value of an individual subscription paid up to the point of purchasing a single report will be deducted from the purchase of that report. (Rebates not to exceed the maximum value of an annual subscription.)
Examples of upcoming reports – that fall within our 2019 research strategy, outlined in the post Alphacution’s Book: Not Hiding, In Plain Sight – that will be available via the aforementioned subscription rebate mechanism include:
- Case Study: Citadel, LLC (~ Q1-2019)
- Case Study: All-Time Top 10 Hedge Fund Managers, Ranked by Profits (~ Q2-2019)
- Case Study: Top Proprietary Trading Firms (~ Q3-2019)
- Case Study: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (~ Q4-2019)
Enterprise subscription packages and custom content/service engagement options are available upon request at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Note: Business credit cards and bank accounts can be used via our PayPal payment portal.
Now, for those of you who don’t expect to take advantage of the offers outlined above but want to continue to enjoy the insights, intelligence and occassional entertainment that remain openly available on the Feed, I want to make this specific plea:
Free doesn’t mean there are no costs. In fact, in this case, there have been extraordinary costs in the accumulation of experience and sight, meticulous curation and assembly of data, and creative visualization of and storytelling around our findings.
So, if you value quality content – here or anywhere else – then you need to find a way to support that content at some level simply because you want it to continue to exist. Our post, In Support of Digital Content – which was adapted from other notable digital era content developers – makes a more expansive case for this perspective.
Bottom line: Your efforts to support via one-time or recurring contributions will help guard against this content needing to move from the currently preferred audience-driven model (for its level of independence) to a sponsorship-driven model (which can be found on most other industry media outlets).
So, if none of the subscription options suit you, one-time and recurring support contributions can be made at any level here:
Of course, as always: If you value this work, please continue to “like it,” share it, comment on it – or discuss amongst your colleagues – and then send us email@example.com.
As our “feedback loop” becomes more vibrant – given input from clients and other members of our network, especially around new questions to be answered – the value of this work will accelerate.
Don’t be shy…
Unsubscribe from prior subscriptions without further obligation, at any time, here: