“There are two kinds of people in the world: 1) Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Oftentimes, when we are expanding an existing model – or, focusing in on a new modeling thread – it makes more sense to keep going until we have absorbed all the relevant data, even after we have already teased some of the findings on the Feed, than to stop and restart down the road. Better to stay in a patch of weeds once you are already stuck down in there. This is the case here. We have published some updated findings on Flow Traders last week – and its closest peer, Virtu Financial, the week before that – but there is still more of note to share:
We are fascinated by the role that the exchange traded product (ETP) market is having on the broader markets, on strategy selection and development, on asset manager growth (and decline), and on the evolution of investor behavior. We have recently been detailing how the growth in listed products has come mainly as a result of growth in ETP’s (aka ETF’s), in the article, “The Stock Market is Made of These.” And, we are particularly fascinated by those rarest of rare market creatures who deploy a ton of technology and know-how to operate closest to the sources of liquidity across cash, “pooled” (or, structured), and derivative products – mainly in US equities. (Our initial assembly of the Top 100 Players in US Listed Market Structure may prove instructive here, particularly now that we are on the verge of expanding that storyboard in the coming days.)
Most of these players – market makers, proprietary trading firms, a short list of legendary quant managers and a declining roster of sell-side firms – tend to specialize in one product class. We might go a step further to tag each of these players’ “wheelhouse” as including a product-asset class-region combo, like US cash equities or European equity ETFs of fixed income futures. However, what interests us most is the subset of these players who trade successfully across product classes and the potential to exhibit leadership across multiple product-asset class-region combos.
This cross-market prowess is a major artery of our research for the foreseeable future because we believe that the (few) players who succeed there are going to be the most dominant players in the #winnertakeall global markets going forward, and therefore, be the ones who impact all other players that come after them in the succession of strategies according to our asset management ecosystem map. So far, it is the option market makers and traders that possess the capacity to wield market dominance – if they haven’t already achieved it – because they are the one’s who demonstrate the capacity to play the computational equivalent of 3-dimensional chess…
Anyway, what we wanted to share here is along the lines of dominance (and concentration) in the ETP market. In the exhibit below, Alphacution presents the regional segmentation of quarterly ETP value traded from BlackRock (by way of Flow Traders’ quarterly financial disclosures). Here we simply want to illustrate to relative sizes of Americas, Europe and Asia ETP value traded (which average 85.3%, 5.6% and 9.0%, respectively, over the 21 quarter period).
Note: The World Federation of Exchanges (WFE) also publishes quite comprehensive statistics on the global ETP market, however, until we figure out how to reconcile those figures with BlackRock’s figures, we are going with the dataset that Flow Traders uses in order to make our point, which is this:
Based on public data, Alphacution has determined that Flow Traders has been interacting with one-third to one-half of the European ETP turnover for at least the past 5 years; a notably strong position as compared to the 1-2% market share of Americas and Asia ETP turnover.
Now, we don’t believe there is another player as dominant in the European ETP market as Flow Traders. Certainly, there isn’t much room for an equivalently-dominant player, but then again we don’t have the same level of transparency in European markets as we do in US markets (via 13F and other filings) to be sure. That said, our ongoing efforts at contextual modeling is likely to yield a means by which to estimate rankings in these and other markets.
Watch this space…
Support the Feed!
Note: Business credit cards and bank accounts can be used via our PayPal payment portal.
Alphacution is in the intelligence business.
We are uniquely focused on harvesting, packaging and distributing intelligence about the impacts of technology in financial markets and on the businesses of trading, asset management and banking. Our growing model library is our intelligence asset. Today, this intelligence asset primarily supports written research content, which can be accessed via standardized subscriptions and customized engagements. Occasionally, this core asset also supports video, audio and live presentation content. In time, Alphacution’s intelligence asset will support a broader platform of products and services, like data feeds and software.
For the past year or so, Alphacution has been publishing most of its research content on its Feed for free, and promoting that content via periodic newsletter. The purpose of this strategy has been to assess the interest in and demand for a unique perspective and a new level of intelligence on the financial markets ecosystem.
And, based on the growth in network and activity around that research, it seems that we have struck a cord with many of you – a network of senior executives representing some of the most advanced players in the global financial markets arena and their stakeholders.
The recent trajectory of pageview metrics on our site is symbolic of this claim, as shown below:
Now it’s time to take that level of engagement and direct it towards a more viable long term economic support model that ultimately allows us to scale our team and enhance the quantity and quality of our intelligence.
So, here’s what we are going to do about that:
For those of you who are eager to derive greater value from this work and apply that intelligence to your own business interests, Alphacution is offering individual introductory subscription options priced at $275 per year or $25 per month, cancellable at any time. Both of these options include a rebate on purchases of deeper, more substantive reports and case studies.
In other words, the entire value of an individual subscription paid up to the point of purchasing a single report will be deducted from the purchase of that report. (Rebates not to exceed the maximum value of an annual subscription.)
Examples of upcoming reports – that fall within our 2019 research strategy, outlined in the post Alphacution’s Book: Not Hiding, In Plain Sight – that will be available via the aforementioned subscription rebate mechanism include:
- Case Study: Citadel, LLC (~ Q1-2019)
- Case Study: All-Time Top 10 Hedge Fund Managers, Ranked by Profits (~ Q2-2019)
- Case Study: Top Proprietary Trading Firms (~ Q3-2019)
- Case Study: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (~ Q4-2019)
Enterprise subscription packages and custom content/service engagement options are available upon request at email@example.com.
Note: Business credit cards and bank accounts can be used via our PayPal payment portal.
Now, for those of you who don’t expect to take advantage of the offers outlined above but want to continue to enjoy the insights, intelligence and occassional entertainment that remain openly available on the Feed, I want to make this specific plea:
Free doesn’t mean there are no costs. In fact, in this case, there have been extraordinary costs in the accumulation of experience and sight, meticulous curation and assembly of data, and creative visualization of and storytelling around our findings.
So, if you value quality content – here or anywhere else – then you need to find a way to support that content at some level simply because you want it to continue to exist. Our post, In Support of Digital Content – which was adapted from other notable digital era content developers – makes a more expansive case for this perspective.
Bottom line: Your efforts to support via one-time or recurring contributions will help guard against this content needing to move from the currently preferred audience-driven model (for its level of independence) to a sponsorship-driven model (which can be found on most other industry media outlets).
So, if none of the subscription options suit you, one-time and recurring support contributions can be made at any level here:
Of course, as always: If you value this work, please continue to “like it,” share it, comment on it – or discuss amongst your colleagues – and then send us firstname.lastname@example.org.
As our “feedback loop” becomes more vibrant – given input from clients and other members of our network, especially around new questions to be answered – the value of this work will accelerate.
Don’t be shy…
Unsubscribe from prior subscriptions without further obligation, at any time, here: